Dog Snot Diaries

I write, you whine….

Friday, September 29, 2006

CSM J. D. Pendry, my kinda guy

I read CSM Pendry’s blog whenever he updates it, and often bookmark it to cite him when he writes something I particularly enjoy. Unfortunately, my time is lacking so when I finally get around to it something new has popped up. Here’s something I bookmarked quite some time ago, yet never got around to posting.

Jimmy Carter, you’re the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You’re the runner-in-chief.

Bill Clinton, you played ring around Lewinsky while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia, and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses embolden the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately they grew bolder, until 9/11.

John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute. You lied about American soldiers in Vietnam. Your military service, like your life, is more fiction than fact. You’ve accused our soldiers of terrorizing women in Iraq. You called Iraq the wrong war, wrong place, wrong time; the same words you used to describe Vietnam. You’re a fake. You want to run from Iraq and abandon the Iraqis to murderers just as you did the Vietnamese. Iraq, like Vietnam is another war that you were for, before you were against it.

John Murtha, you said our military was broken. You said we can’t win militarily in Iraq. You accused United States Marines of cold-blooded murder without proof.. And said we should redeploy to Okinawa. Okinawa, John? And the Democrats call you their military expert. Are you sure you didn’t suffer a traumatic brain injury while you were off building your war hero resume? You’re a sad, pitiable, corrupt and washed up politician. You’re not a Marine, sir. You wouldn’t amount to a pimple on a real Marine’s butt. You’re a phony and a disgrace. Run away John.

Dick Durbin, you accused our Soldiers at Guantanamo of being Nazis, tenders of Soviet style gulags and as bad as the regime of Pol Pot who murdered two million of his own people after your party abandoned South East Asia to the Communists. Now you want to abandon the Iraqis to the same fate. History was not a good teacher for you, was it? See dick run.

Ted Kennedy, for days on end you held poster-sized pictures from Abu Grhaib in front of any available television camera. Al Jazeera quoted you saying that Iraqis torture chambers were open under new management. Did you see the news this week Teddy? The Islamic Nazis demonstrate real torture for you again. If you truly supported our troops, you’d show the world poster-sized pictures of that atrocity and demand the annihilation of it. Your legislation stripping support from the South Vietnamese led to a communist victory there. You’re a bloated fool bent on repeating the same historical blunder that turned freedom-seeking people over to homicidal, genocidal maniacs. To paraphrase John Murtha, all while sitting on your wide, gin-soaked rear-end in Washington.

Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Carl Levine, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Pat Leahy, Chuck Schumer et al ad nauseam. Every time you stand in front of television cameras and broadcast to the Islamic Nazis that we went to war because our President lied. That the war is wrong and our Soldiers are torturers. That we should leave Iraq, you give the Islamic butchers the same ones that tortured and mutilated American soldiers – cause to think that we will run away again and all they have to do is hang on a little longer.

American news media, the New York Times particularly. Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods, you become one with the sub-human pieces of camel dung that torture and mutilate the bodies of American Soldiers. You can’t strike up the courage to publish cartoons, but you can help Al Qaeda destroy my country.

Actually, you are more dangerous to us than Al Qaeda is. Think about that each time you face Mecca to admire your Pulitzer. You are America’s axis of idiots. Your collective stupidity will destroy us. Self-serving politics and terrorist abetting news scoops are more important to you than our national security or the lives of innocent civilians and soldiers. It bothers you that defending ourselves gets in the way of your elitist sport of politics and your ignorant editorializing. There is as much blood on your hands as is on the hands of murdering terrorists. Don’t ever doubt that. Your frolics will only serve to extend this war as they extended Vietnam. If you want our soldiers home, as you claim, knock off the crap and try supporting your country ahead of supporting your silly political aims and aiding our enemies. Yes, I’m questioning your patriotism. Your loyalty ends with self. I’m also questioning why you’re stealing air that decent Americans could be breathing. You don’t deserve the protection of our men and women in uniform. You need to run away from this war, this country.. Leave the war to the people who have the will to see it through and the country to people who are willing to defend it.

No, Commander-in-Chief, you don’t get off the hook either. Our country has two enemies: Those who want to destroy us from the outside and those who attempt it from within. Your soldiers are dealing with the outside force. It’s your obligation to support them by confronting the axis of idiots.. America must hear it from you that these people are harming our country, abetting the enemy and endangering our safety. Well up a little anger please, and channel it toward the appropriate target. You must prosecute those who leak national security secrets to the media. You must prosecute those in the media who knowingly publish those secrets. Our soldiers need you to confront the enemy that they cannot. They need you to do it now!

J.D. Pendry is a retired Army Command Sergeant Major who writes for Random House

Copyright J.D. Pendry 2006

posted by Geoffrey at 8:25 pm


  1. JDP nails it! The only thing that could possibly be added is, according to Ann Coulter, Bill Clinton is just a “horny hick.? Yep, she said it on Fox News – I saw it today – so it probably was said last night.

    “Bill Clinton, you are just a horny hick who played ring around Lewinsky while the terrorists were at war with us…”

    There. All fixed!

    Comment by BT in SA — September 30, 2006 @ 2:58 pm

  2. Amen!

    Comment by Pam — September 30, 2006 @ 9:52 pm

  3. Wow. The GOP is in shambles and all you have is digging up dead horses to whip.

    smiles…this isn’t even funny anymore, it is just embarassing.

    Comment by heheh — October 4, 2006 @ 6:07 pm

  4. Shambles? Typical moonbat. What makes you think the GOP is “in shambles”?

    Not that it matters. Billary is going to be an easy win.

    Comment by Geoffrey — October 4, 2006 @ 6:16 pm

  5. There’s a certain special forces commander by the name of Charlie Beckwith, something like a colonel or something, who talks about how Carter had the balls to launch a Delta Force rescue operation against Iran, but kept it all secret, and never, to this day, has used it as a political chip.

    Shut the fuck up on calling Carter a pussy. Explain to me how hard-balls GW was sitting in an elementary classroom with a retard-book on his lap and how he got all hardcore so quickly. Or, NOT so quickly. Or, NOT at all… until… um, when? Aides told him kids had been killed, and he sat there, reading Berenstein Bears…

    shut up. And I’M a republican! Don’t defend douchebags simply because you find it important to argue via ignorant, stupid party lines.

    Comment by His Daddy — October 6, 2006 @ 12:57 am

  6. “There’s a certain special forces commander by the name of Charlie Beckwith, something like a colonel or something…”

    Commander… Colonel… something like that.

    We have ouselves a real subject matter expert on the military.

    Comment by Gordon — October 6, 2006 @ 2:56 am

  7. Yes, because grammatical content is so much more important than the message.

    I remember Beckwith. You can read more about him here

    Tp sit there and sayy Carter ran and didn’t do anythin shows how ignorant these folks are. But that doesn’t surprise me in the least.

    Comment by oooo — October 6, 2006 @ 4:38 am

  8. Not only was Carter a pussy, he was an incompetent pussy.

    You know why Carter never mentioned Beckwith’s operation into Iran? Because it was a complete and utter embarrassment. Nice of you to bring it up, though. They lost 8 good men, 7 helicopters, and a C130. Could you explain to me how that would be a good political chip for Carter?

    Registering as a Republican doesn’t mean you aren’t a liberal moonbat.

    Comment by Geoffrey — October 6, 2006 @ 8:37 am

  9. and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage.

    I was merely responding to this idiotic phrase. Because the operation failed does not equate to a lack of effort. Flip flop. Backpeddle.

    Comment by oooo — October 6, 2006 @ 7:42 pm

  10. Ok, so he made a half-hearted attempt that failed miserably.

    So he’s not a complete pussy. He’s a 3/4 pussy and extremely incompetent.

    Comment by Geoffrey — October 6, 2006 @ 7:44 pm

  11. Also, you cannot just go into every crisis with guns blazing and expect all to be well. Thank God Carter didn’t go in full force at a time when the Ayatollah was so damn popular in the region.

    Ever wonder why the middle east is a damn 3rd world region stuck in the mud of the past? Because war is the only tool they use to try and solve their differences. This is something you lack the ability to wrap your neanderthal brian around. Pounding fists rarley every solve any problems. No, WW2 wasn’t won because of the might of the western allies – it was won because Germany ran out of the resources to feed the war machine. The Soviet Union didn’t fall because they were afraid of Regan, it fell because it could no longer sustain itself economically. War costs far more than what people understand, long long after the last round is fired. WW2 is still being paid for on so many fronts.
    Again, I do not expect you to understand any of this becauuse your brain in stuck in a perma-fog.

    Comment by oooo — October 6, 2006 @ 7:49 pm

  12. extremely incompetent.

    kinda like GH Bush in 91 and his son today, huh?

    Comment by oooo — October 6, 2006 @ 7:50 pm

  13. and i won;t be surprise if you, Geoff, are one of these fools in denial about the war in iraq. you probably think it is goingg great…

    Comment by oooo — October 6, 2006 @ 7:56 pm

  14. Did you have a point?

    I always laugh when I see people defending Carter. They never stick with it long before they start changing the topic.

    Comment by Geoffrey — October 6, 2006 @ 9:05 pm

  15. “kinda like GH Bush in 91”

    Carter: A failed hostage rescue attempt.

    Bush Sr: Desert Storm.

    I see the parrallel now. Crystal clear.

    Comment by Gordon — October 6, 2006 @ 11:21 pm

  16. bush sr. didn’t finish the job. period.

    clear now faggot frat boy?

    Comment by oooo — October 7, 2006 @ 12:39 pm

  17. Look at the moonbat cut and run.

    Post. Get bitchslapped. Shift topic.

    Comment by Gordon — October 7, 2006 @ 1:37 pm

    No Commander in Chief and Vice President Cheney, you don’t get off the hook either. As the great Civil War General (a little higher rank than that of CSM if I am not mistaken) Sherman said, “It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry for blood, more vengeance. More desolation.” and true to form, you two who ducked combat duty to defend your country in Vietnam felt no qualms about sending thousands of U.S. servicemen to their death or condemned tens of thousands of the others to be maimed for life over a pack of lies. Your hands are filthy with the blood and severed body parts of our young. Compare the magnitude of the consequences of your lieswith that of “I did not have sex with that woman”:

    “He is actively pursuing nuclear weapons at this time”
    –Dick Cheney March 24, 2002

    ”Simply stated, there is NO DOUBT that Saddam Hussein
    now has weapons of mass destruction. We now KNOW
    Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear
    –Dick Cheney Speech to VFW National Convention
    August 26, 2002

    ”And the regime continues to pursue the nuclear program it began so many years ago. These are not weapons for the purpose of defending Iraq; these are offensive weapons for the purpose of inflicting death on a massive scale, developed so Saddam can hold the threat over the head of anyone he chooses, in his own region or beyond. WE NOW KNOW Saddam has resumed his efforts to acquire nuclear weapons.”
    –Dick Cheney September 2, 2002

    MR. RUSSERT: He does not have a nuclear weapon now?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: I can’t say that. I can say that I
    know for sure that he’s trying to acquire the

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: But we do know, with absolute
    certainty, that he is using his procurement system to
    acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich
    uranium to build a nuclear weapon.
    VICE PRES. CHENEY: I don’t want to talk about,
    obviously, specific intelligence sources, but it’s now
    public that, in fact, he has been seeking to acquire,
    and we have been able to intercept and prevent him
    from acquiring through this particular channel, the
    kinds of tubes that are necessary to build a
    VICE PRES. CHENEY: Now, the more recent developments
    have to do with our now being able to conclude, based
    on intelligence that’s becoming available, some of it
    has been made public, more of it hopefully will be,
    that he has indeed stepped up his capacity to produce
    and deliver biological weapons, that he has
    reconstituted his nuclear program to develop a nuclear
    weapon, that there are efforts under way inside Iraq
    to significantly expand his capability.September 6,

    “WE KNOW he has worked to and has succeeded in improving his biological weapons capability. And we’re confident that he has also begun, once again, to try to acquire a nuclear weapon.”
    –Dick Cheney September 10, 2002

    “The danger to our country is grave. The danger to our country is growing. The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons…. The regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material, could build one within a year….The dangers we face will only worsen from month to month and from year to year. To ignore these threats is to encourage them. And when they have fully materialized it may be too late to protect ourselves and our friends and our allies. By then the Iraqi dictator would have the means to terrorize and dominate the region. Each passing day could be the one on which the Iraqi regime gives anthrax or VX – nerve gas – or some day a nuclear weapon to a terrorist ally.”
    — George W. Bush Rose Garden remarks, September 26, 2002

    “If WE KNOW Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today — and we do — does it make any sense for the world to wait to confront him as he grows even stronger and develops even more dangerous weapons?”– George W. Bush October 7, 2002

    –WE KNOW FOR A FACT that there are weapons there.
    Ari Fleischer (Bush & Cheney puppet) Press Briefing
    January 9, 2003

    “We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein
    recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use
    chemical weapons — the very weapons the dictator
    tells us he does not have.”
    –George W. Bush Radio Address 2/8/03

    MR. RUSSERT: What do you think is the most important
    rationale for going to war with Iraq?

    VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I think I’ve just given it,
    Tim, in terms of the combination of his development
    and use of chemical weapons, his development of
    biological weapons, his pursuit of nuclear weapons.

    WE KNOW he’s out trying once again to produce nuclear
    weapons and we know that he has a long-standing
    relationship with various terrorist groups, including
    the al-Qaeda organization.
    March 16, 2003

    “Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves NO DOUBT that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”
    –George W. Bush Address to the Nation March 17, 2003

    Comment by Wilmer J. Furman — October 15, 2006 @ 12:09 pm

  19. J.D. Pendry is a fraud!!!

    Comment by Don Hunter — March 10, 2007 @ 9:47 pm

  20. Another disgruntled moonbat.

    Comment by Geoffrey — March 10, 2007 @ 11:22 pm

  21. Didn’t have WMD? How do you account for the gassing of his own countrymen/women/children?

    Comment by MTW — March 14, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

  22. Would like to use Mr. Pendry’s comments in a forthcoming book.

    Comment by Art Hendon — March 17, 2007 @ 2:25 pm

  23. #21
    He used some of the chemical weapons that Bush(1) gave him?
    Do you remember the Iraq-Iran war? Oh Wait – the so-called letter from Sgt. Maj (Ret) Pendry SKIPPED those years didn’t it? There is no mention of the 12 Reagan-Bush years as if there was no terrorism during that period.

    Comment by Oldfart — March 28, 2007 @ 10:58 am

  24. I have no idea what you’re taking about. I don’t think YOU know what you’re talking about.

    Comment by Geoffrey — March 28, 2007 @ 11:01 am

  25. Oldfart doesn’t know his own ass from his face.

    Comment by Gordon — March 28, 2007 @ 6:10 pm

  26. As a WWII veteran, I recall some senator saying “Politics must stop at the water’s edge.” Now they say “Political power is more important than national security and soldiers lives.”

    Comment by Lt Col John — July 18, 2007 @ 6:00 pm

  27. Don Hunter you’re an idiot and Jimmy “Peanut Lips” Carter is a wore out old pussy who was a failure at farming and the Presidency.

    Comment by SFC88 — October 18, 2007 @ 8:21 pm

  28. Hoowee, I just stumbled on this blog while cross checking a quote. Lots of testoserone flowing here. I think Mr. Furman and General Sherman make an excellent point. There is so much bravado extended at the blood of someone else. Just ten seconds in real combat would make pacifists of most of us. If you have not been shot at don’t be beating your breast. Yet, it does not excuse the need to keep madmen from our shore. Make no mistake about it, they hate us with an undying hatred and holding a sign that says “Give peace a chance.” is as helpful as tits on a bull. Personally, I loathe Carter but I lose little sleep on his ramblings. I no more believe Bush lied about WMD than Hillary had an affair with what’s his name who took his life. Yet, WMD or not, hindsight says it was a huge mistake going into Iraq with no real game plan let alone understanding tribal allegiances. For that I fault Bush and Rumsfeld entirely. Also, all this crap about lowering taxes while dumping the single largest deficit that both my children and grandchildren will have to inherit from my generation makes my blood boil. I am old enough now to be an equal opportunity hater of both sides of Congress. They are self serving opportunists whose bottom line is getting reelected and not for the welfare of our country.

    Comment by Tom Perkins — November 8, 2007 @ 4:54 pm

  29. JD Pendry really did a fantastic analytical assessment of those skumdogs. Anyone who can possibly disagree with Pendry has to be a mindless , straphanging pussy.

    Comment by Barney — December 5, 2007 @ 11:17 am

  30. Hate Mongers do nothing to make America Great. Scum is way above the bottom feeders.

    Comment by George Clark — January 21, 2008 @ 7:33 pm

  31. If, and that’s a big if, that fat thighed broad gets lucky enough to be elected to the White House we are all going down the drain, she hates America with a vengeance and will sell us to the highest bidder. And if, same big if, that closet Muslim gets in he will turn us over to Iran or Kenya. You better vote REPUBLICAN and put the right REPUBLICAN in office and lets take Congress back from those spineless Democrats.

    God bless America and President Bush and last but not least by far our troops who are paying the price for our freedom. Support them or feel free to stand in front of them.


    Comment by SFC88 — January 31, 2008 @ 12:34 am

  32. A Sergeant Major is one rank above a First Sergeant. It is an enlisted man or woman who is the highest ranking enlisted person in a company of approximately 140 people. Hoop-de-doo! His rantings only convince me that he’s trying to sell books on FIX News. He’s an obvious “lifer” who was brainwashed by the military. He’s the kind of “Amerikan” who yells “USA USA USA” at Olympic events, while others in the international community simply roll their eyes. John Wayne indeed. Well, those days are gone Mr. Lifer. I was a paratrooper in Nam in 68. Where did this perckerwood serve? Was he a combatant? I have to wonder. I have met so many “almost combatants” who thought they were John Wayne that I can’t even count them. I think I have just discovered another.

    Comment by Dan Pomeroy — May 14, 2009 @ 11:15 am

  33. You obviously don’t know what a SGM does. 140 people? Heh. Look it up again before you try to pass yourself off as a soldier.

    Go back to France, toolbag.

    Comment by Geoffrey — May 14, 2009 @ 7:20 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress